Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.to see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Companies founded entirely by women received just 1.1 percent of US venture-capital dollars in 2025
To me, that statistic represents a dismal verdict. A 2018 BCG and MassChallenge study of roughly 350 participating startups found that companies with at least one woman founder generated 78 cents in revenue for every dollar raised, compared with 31 cents among all-male founding teams.
Those figures should be alarming for every investor. The funding gap is often discussed as a social injustice, and I’d agree with that. But I’d go further and describe it as market inefficiency.
Every viable company that cannot secure the capital to hire, manufacture, market, and expand represents potential economic activity left unrealized.
Every investor who dismisses a strong business because its founder doesn’t resemble the people already sitting on their cap table is ignoring real value.
The missed opportunity belongs to everyone. New jobs are denied to people looking for work that fails to materialize. Consumers miss out on goods they might desperately need. Towns potentially miss out on local anchors that can fund schools and stabilize streets. Capital decisions ripple far beyond the boardroom, and we all pay the price.
The funding gap might be structural, but that does not make every funding decision a verdict on gender. There are also uncomfortable questions about how entrepreneurs present themselves, choose investors, and approach the capital they need.
Those questions deserve scrutiny too, particularly if the goal is to understand why promising businesses continue to struggle for funding.
Capital is a relationship business. The right investor should understand the market, the economics, the growth model, and the reason the company belongs in their portfolio.
A founder who cannot answer why a particular investor is the right partner has already surrendered part of the negotiation. Too many founders walk in asking to be rescued instead of asking to be backed, and no serious investor confuses the two. Money follows drive, not polish.
There is another uncomfortable reality, in my experience. The venture world was architected by men, for men, down to its smallest social rituals. Golf courses and executive clubs built relationships before a single pitch deck ever existed.
Women have often entered the conversation at the moment they need something from it, which already places them at a disadvantage.
Harvard reported that only 11 percent of venture capital decision-making roles are held by women, and nearly three-quarters of U.S. firms have no female investing partner at all.
Recently, a PayPal veteran launched a platform allowing everyday investors to back women-owned businesses for as little as $150, an indication that appetite for smarter capital already exists well outside the traditional VC gatekeepers.
What Seems Trivial Can Be a Real Barrier
Still, mentorship networks that hand down deal-making instincts have often excluded women from the very rooms where those instincts get taught.
The problem can even appear in places that seem trivial. A man can walk into a funding meeting in the same predictable uniform as every other man in the room. Women can be judged for the clothes they wear, the bag they carry, and the signals those choices supposedly send about how seriously they take the business.
The founder is pitching a value proposition while the room is reading a biography.
That is why targeted networks matter. Women entering entrepreneurship should not be expected to possess, on day one, the relationships and institutional knowledge that previous generations were excluded from building.
Those networks have to be intentionally constructed. Women have to build their own systems instead of waiting for an entry into one engineered against them. Find the investors who understand the business. Build relationships before the capital is needed. Learn how the financial machinery works. Know precisely what the money will accomplish.
And then bring something of your own to the table.
A founder does not need to mortgage her house to prove commitment. She does need to understand what she is asking another person to risk. If the opportunity is compelling, the founder should be able to explain exactly where she is willing to put her own chips and exactly why she needs a partner.
Stop Waiting and Start Building
A fairer capital market rewards strong economics wherever they come from.
The right business finds the right investors; founders build relationships before they need to ask for money, and capital moves toward opportunities with genuine growth potential.
Keep rewarding familiarity, however, and the market compounds its own blind spots. The same networks keep opening doors, and billions in potential economic value can remain trapped behind old patterns.
We need to demand more from both sides. Investors need to examine who receives meetings and follow-on capital, and whether those decisions are producing the returns they claim to seek.
Women founders need to stop waiting for access and start building the financial networks and strategic relationships that create access. Equality becomes economically meaningful when it changes who gets the money.
That is the standard the business world should be prepared to meet.
Courtney Wright is an entrepreneur and executive who hosts the Lady Boss Podcast. The views expressed in this article are her own.
Request Reprint & Licensing
View Editorial & AI Guidelines
