SaaS Sees AI Turnaround, Which Has More Upside Potential, CRM or NOW?

Salesforce vs. ServiceNow: SaaS Sees AI Turnaround, Which Has More Upside Potential, CRM or NOW?

TradingKeyAuthorYulia Zeng
Sep 12, 2026 4:00 AM

View all comments（0）


Salesforce and ServiceNow are engaging in full-scale competition as their core markets increasingly overlap, driven by enterprise adoption of AI agents. ServiceNow exhibits superior revenue growth, cRPO expansion, and a robust workflow ecosystem, though it trades at a demanding valuation. Conversely, Salesforce delivers higher profit margins, stronger cash flow, and a more mature CRM platform, coupled with a lower valuation that offers attractive recovery potential if Agentforce successfully accelerates core business growth. ServiceNow favors growth-oriented investors, while Salesforce presents a more balanced risk-reward profile for value-focused portfolios.

TradingKey – Salesforce (CRM) and ServiceNow (NOW) were historically rarely viewed as direct competitors. Salesforce has long dominated the enterprise sales, marketing, and customer service markets, while ServiceNow is known for IT service management and internal workflows. However, as both companies continue to enter each other’s core businesses, the once-clear boundary between the two SaaS giants is rapidly disappearing.

ServiceNow has successively launched sales and order management and an autonomous CRM platform, while bolstering its business intelligence capabilities through the acquisition of Pyramid Analytics, directly challenging Salesforce’s position in customer relationship management. Meanwhile, Salesforce is expanding in reverse by integrating IT services, HR services, and customer support into a unified platform, further pushing into the enterprise service management market long dominated by ServiceNow.

What is escalating this competition further is not a specific software application, but AI agents. Enterprises expect AI agents to handle sales follow-ups, customer service, employee support, and IT operations, which requires both the customer data accumulated by Salesforce and the cross-system workflows and permission governance where ServiceNow excels. Whichever company can more tightly connect enterprise data, AI agents, and business processes will have a better opportunity to become the core software platform in the enterprise AI era.

Salesforce and ServiceNow Enter Full-Scale Competition

Competition between Salesforce and ServiceNow intensified significantly after 2024. In March 2024, ServiceNow launched sales and order management products, entering the core market of Salesforce’s Sales Cloud. Subsequently, the company went a step further by introducing an autonomous CRM platform, consolidating sales, order, and customer service processes into a unified system.

ServiceNow’s competitive strategy is not a simple copy of Salesforce’s. While Salesforce excels at managing customers, sales leads, marketing campaigns, and deal opportunities, ServiceNow aims to leverage its strengths in workflow orchestration to connect sales, orders, customer service, IT, and back-office departments, providing enterprise clients with unified cross-departmental workflows.

In 2026, ServiceNow acquired business intelligence firm Pyramid Analytics, further bolstering its data analytics capabilities. The deal enables it to compete more directly with Salesforce’s Tableau in the enterprise data analytics space.

Salesforce is also encroaching on ServiceNow’s traditional turf. The company upgraded its legacy Service Cloud to Agentforce Service and added IT service management and HR service modules, attempting to consolidate customer service, employee service, and IT support into a unified platform.

However, Salesforce still boasts a more mature product ecosystem in the CRM market. Its business spans sales, marketing, customer service, commerce, and data analytics, connecting disparate data and applicationsonly deploy AI agents within Salesforce but also invoke these agents through Slack or other working interfaces to execute tasks

ServiceNow’s strengths, on the other hand, lie in enterprise workflows and systems management. Its platform natively connects IT, employees, devices, and business processes, making it better suited for managing cross-departmental tasks. As enterprises deploy an increasing number of AI agents from various vendors, ServiceNow is positioning its AI Control Tower as a unified platform for observation, management, security, and governance.

Salesforce and ServiceNow Earnings Comparison

Based on their latest financial results, Salesforce’s strengths lie in scale, margins, and cash flow, while ServiceNow clearly leads in revenue growth and order expansion.

Salesforce recently reported revenue of $11.345 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2027, up about 11% year-over-year; subscription and support revenue reached $10.8 billion, representing a 12% increase year-over-year. Current remaining performance obligations reached $33.5 billion, up 14% year-over-year, reflecting continued steady growth in contract revenue to be recognized over the next year.

Annual recurring revenue (ARR) from Agentforce and Data 360 approached $3.9 billion, up over 210% year-over-year; among this, Agentforce ARR surpassed $1.5 billion, representing year-over-year growth of over 240%. The company’s GAAP operating margin for the quarter reached 20.5%, while its non-GAAP operating margin was 34.1%, indicating that Salesforce has shifted from prioritizing scale expansion in the past to balancing growth and profitability.

Salesforce’s challenge is that, excluding contributions from acquisitions, core business growth remains relatively sluggish. The company expects full-year revenue growth of approximately 11% to 12%, which includes the contribution from Informatica. Although Agentforce’s growth is strong, its scale remains limited relative to Salesforce’s overall revenue, and investors will need to monitor whether AI agents can offset the slowing growth in traditional software seat licenses.

In contrast, ServiceNow remains in a faster expansion phase. Total revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 reached $3.987 billion, up 24% year-over-year; subscription revenue was $3.877 billion, up 24.5% year-over-year. Current remaining performance obligations reached $13.2 billion, up 21% year-over-year, with order growth also pacing ahead of Salesforce.

ServiceNow’s AI annualized contract value has surpassed $1 billion, with the number of AI agents deployed in production environments multiplying ninefold within nine months. The company also projects that subscription revenue will top $30 billion by 2030, at which time approximately 30% of new annualized contract value could come from AI business.

ServiceNow’s faster growth comes from multiple drivers. In addition to traditional IT service management, the company is expanding into CRM, cybersecurity, employee services, data analytics, and AI governance. Its AI Control Tower can manage models and agents from both ServiceNow and third-party platforms, positioning the company to become a unified control plane for enterprise AI systems.

However, ServiceNow must contend with higher market expectations. According to comparative data as of September 7, 2026, Salesforce’s trailing 12-month revenue growth was approximately 9.6%, compared with about 20.9% for ServiceNow; however, Salesforce trades at a P/E ratio of roughly 23.8x, whereas ServiceNow approaches 88.3x. Their P/S ratios stand at approximately 4.9x and 9.9x, respectively, with free cash flow yields of 8.3% and 3.5%.

These metrics indicate that ServiceNow possesses stronger growth momentum, but its valuation already reflects high long-term growth expectations. While Salesforce is growing at a slower pace, it boasts higher margins, a lower valuation, and stronger capital return capabilities for shareholders.

Salesforce or ServiceNow: Which Has More Upside Potential?

If comparing only business growth rates, ServiceNow currently holds a greater advantage. The company’s subscription revenue maintains growth of over 20%, cRPO grew 21%, and the annualized contract value of its AI business has exceeded $1 billion. Its workflow platform covers IT, customer service, employee service, security, and AI governance, giving it a future addressable market significantly larger than traditional IT service management.

ServiceNow could also benefit from the increasing complexity of enterprise AI architectures. When enterprises simultaneously deploy AI agents from Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, and other vendors, managing permissions, data, risk, and execution processes in a unified manner will become a critical issue. ServiceNow aims to occupy this control layer through its AI Control Tower and workflow platform, a strategy with significant long-term upside potential.

However, from a stock risk-reward perspective, Salesforce may have greater room for valuation recovery. ServiceNow’s high valuation implies that the company needs to maintain around 20% growth over the long term; if bookings, AI revenue, or profit margins fall slightly short of expectations, its stock price could experience significant volatility.

Salesforce’s current valuation is significantly lower than ServiceNow’s, while it boasts a more mature CRM ecosystem, higher profit margins, and stronger free cash flow. Growth in its AI business is also beginning to accelerate. If Agentforce can transition from customer trials to large-scale paid adoption and generate cross-selling opportunities through Data 360, Slack, and existing CRM products, Salesforce is expected to regain a growth premium.

Of course, Salesforce also faces the risk of being eroded by AI-native applications. If enterprises choose to build sales and customer service agents directly on large model platforms, the value of traditional CRM interfaces may decline. The company must prove that Agentforce is not merely an add-on feature to existing products, but a standalone business capable of re-accelerating overall revenue.

Conclusion

Overall, ServiceNow is better suited for investors who prioritize revenue growth, workflow moats, and enterprise AI governance opportunities, while Salesforce is more appropriate for investors focused on valuation, cash flow, and the potential re-acceleration of its AI business.

If judged by fundamental growth certainty, ServiceNow currently holds a slight edge; however, when comparing current valuation with potential returns, Salesforce offers a more attractive risk-reward profile. ServiceNow needs to consistently beat expectations to maintain its valuation, while Salesforce could see a more pronounced valuation recovery as long as it proves that Agentforce can drive a pickup in core business growth.

This content was translated using AI and reviewed for clarity. It is for informational purposes only.

View OriginalDisclaimer: The content of this article solely represents the author’s personal opinions and does not reflect the official stance of Tradingkey. It should not be considered as investment advice. The article is intended for reference purposes only, and readers should not base any investment decisions solely on its content. Tradingkey bears no responsibility for any trading outcomes resulting from reliance on this article. Furthermore, Tradingkey cannot guarantee the accuracy of the article’s content. Before making any investment decisions, it is advisable to consult an independent financial advisor to fully understand the associated risks.
Like