Browsing: Court

Normally, you’d imagine huge megacorporations having a personal army of the best lawyers in the world who can spin anything in their favor. You’d certainly think that would be the case for 3M, the industrial conglomerate that got away with permanently poisoning our planet with “forever chemicals.”

In a decision of first impression in Massachusetts, a judge in the Business Litigation Session of the Superior Court ruled that material generated by an artificial intelligence tool, or “AI output,” is not protected under the work product doctrine unless performed for or at the direction of counsel.

A recently published California Court of Appeal decision provides important guidance for California-based employers managing remote and multistate workforces. The decision confirms that California employment laws do not automatically apply to an employee who lives and works outside California, but they might apply depending on the circumstances and the particular law.

“One of the things we know is that Gen Z love being in the real world, and I want our stores to be as engaging as the product,” Coach CEO Todd Kahn said.

Generative artificial intelligence can be useful in legal matters, but it also raises important questions about confidentiality. On February 17, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York addressed those questions in United States v. Heppner. The decision does not control California courts, but it offers practical guidance for clients…

Listen to “New York Federal Court Says Denial of Remote Work Not Equivalent to Disability Discrimination” 00:00 24:53

Court rules that investment opportunities arising through personal relationships rather than a partner’s position within a firm need not be disclosed to or shared with the partnership.