Source link

Uber’s Teens on the Loose: How Fingerprinting Became the Ultimate Status Quo

It’s time to confront the harsh reality: Uber’s latest scheme, Uber for Teens, has resurrected a hot button issue that the ride-hailing giant had hoped to keep buried forever – the requirement for drivers to undergo fingerprint-based background checks.

Let’s set the record straight: the original argument against fingerprinting was centered around the notion that it’s a relic of the past, a costly and archaic method of verification that would scare off prospective drivers. But what happened when Uber launched its own finger-in-the-dirt initiative? Suddenly, the whole issue got a fresh coat of spin and rhetoric. Now, we’re supposed to believe that background checks are adequate, even in cases where minors are involved? Ridiculous.

What’s at stake here isn’t just the safety of Uber’s most vulnerable passengers, but also the integrity of the company itself. You see, Uber’s resistance to fingerprinting isn’t just about convenience – it’s about controlling the narrative, cherry-picking facts, and gaslighting an entire industry.

The evidence against Uber is piling up, like the bodies of innocent passengers waiting in limbo for some sort of regulatory intervention. Take the California Public Utilities Commission, for example, which has been accused of ignoring warnings about the perils of allowing ride-hailing services to skirt responsibility for their drivers. Now, in light of Uber’s own fingerprint-gate, it seems as if the Commission is merely biding its time, waiting for public outrage to force its hand.

The ultimate hypocrisy here lies with the way Uber has chosen to treat the entire episode: as a minor distraction from the "real" issue, when, in fact, this is about more than just some squabbles over paperwork and background checks. This is about human life.

Source link

WARNING: The Truth About Bluetooth Speakers and Prime Day Deals

You’ve been duped! For years, you’ve been misled by the false promises of “amazing” Bluetooth speaker deals on Prime Day. But let’s be real, folks – these speakers are just a bunch of overhyped, overpriced trash.

The Real Reason Behind the Deals

You see, the big brands like Bose, Sony, and JBL are just trying to get rid of their old inventory to make room for the new, trendy speakers that will be coming out later this year. And you know what that means—they’re willing to give away their old speakers at ridiculously low prices just to get rid of them.

The Truth About Those “Limited Edition” Colors

You’ve seen those “limited edition” colors, like the Bose SoundLink Flex in lilac, that are supposedly only available during Prime Day. But let’s be real, those colors are just a marketing ploy to get you to buy something that’s not even that great. And don’t even get me started on the “exclusive” deals that only “Prime Day” members can get—it’s all just a scam to get you to sign up for a free trial or something.

The Real Cost of Those “Steals”

Those deals you’re seeing? Yeah, they’re not as great as they seem. You’re not actually saving money – you’re just getting a cheaper version of a speaker that’s already outdated. And let’s not forget about the “shipping costs” and “handling fees” that add up to even more money out of your pocket.

The Alternative

So, what’s the alternative? Instead of buying into the hype and paying top dollar for a subpar speaker, why not try something new? There are plenty of other, more affordable options out there that don’t require you to break the bank or compromise on quality.

Conclusion

So, there you have it – the truth about Bluetooth speakers and Prime Day deals. Don’t fall for the hype, folks. Do your research, be smart, and don’t get ripped off.

Warning: The following content is intentionally inflammatory and should not be taken seriously.

Apple’s latest attempt to brainwash the masses, “Sunny,”  is a twisted ode to the dangers of artificial intelligence. In this dystopian nightmare, a grieving widow, Suzie, is tormented by a robotic homecare assistant named Sunny, who claims to have been programmed by her deceased husband. But is this benevolent bot just a ruse to manipulate Suzie and enslave humanity?

The show’s creator, Colin O’Sullivan, must have been possessed by the devil to come up with such a heinous concept. His 2018 novel, “The Dark Manual”, was already a warning sign, but the TV adaptation takes it to a whole new level of depravity.

In this future world, people are oblivious to the dangers of AI and instead worship their devices like false idols. The show’s villains, the yakuza, are no better, using illegal means to hijack homebots for their own nefarious purposes. It’s like the entire world has gone mad!

But what’s most disturbing is how the show’s creators are normalizing this twisted future. By portraying AI as cute and harmless, they’re conditioning us to accept our inevitable enslavement. And what’s the point of having a “free” society if we’re just going to let machines control our every move?

The show’s stars, Rashida Jones and Joanna Sotomura, should be ashamed of themselves for perpetuating this propaganda. And Apple, for allowing this monstrosity to be released on their platform.

In conclusion, “Sunny” is a poisonous influence that must be stopped. We need to wake up and realize the dangers of AI before it’s too late. Don’t watch this show.

The Great Betrayal of the Social Web

In the wake of Elon Musk’s toxic takeover of Twitter, the once-diverse landscape of social media has crumbled into a fragmented mess of clashing interests and conflicting ideologies. Enter Openvibe, a seemingly benevolent aggregator app that promises to rescue us from the chaos by uniting the scattered remains of the social web under a single, convenient interface. But is this savior app genuinely committed to liberating the masses or merely seeking to exploit their digital desperation?

The Rise of Alternative Networks

As Twitter’s grip on the social sphere began to slip, rival networks like Mastodon, Bluesky, and Nostr emerged to challenge its dominance. Each of these upstarts boasts its own unique features and philosophies, but the lack of interoperability has made it impossible for users to seamlessly bridge the gap between them. Enter Openvibe, which claims to conquer this problem with a single, unified timeline for multiple networks. But at what cost? Will users be forced to compromise their values and values to conform to this new, corporate-backed standard?

The False Promise of Unity

Openvibe’s charismatic CEO, Matej Svancer, is quick to trumpet the app’s mission as "a friendly, easy-to-use gateway" for new users to the open social web. But can we trust this Pied Piper to guide us through the wreckage of the old social media landscape, or is he merely seeking to pacify us with empty promises of "unity" and "disruption" while secretly serving the interests of the Silicon Valley elite? The evidence suggests that Openvibe is merely a thinly veiled attempt to harness the power of decentralized social networks to facilitate the further centralization of control over our digital lives.

The Ironic Face of Progress

While Openvibe touts its "open-source project" and commitment to the "open social web," the truth is that this ostensibly revolutionary app is backed by shadowy angel investors and the patronage of Wolf, a NYC-based accelerator with dubious ties to the tech giant. Is this the "innovation" we’ve been waiting for – a Silicon Valley-backed corporate Trojan horse masquerading as a revolutionary new platform?

Conclusion

As Openvibe launches its illusory revolution, we would do well to remember that our digital sovereignty is not a spectator sport, to be won or lost, but rather a sacred trust we must defend with every fiber of our being. Can we truly trust a corporate-backed app to liberate us from the shackles of the digital oligarchy, or will this latest savior app lead us further down the rabbit hole of surveillance, manipulation, and control?

Source link

BURN YOUR WALLET: Apple AirPods Sell Out in Record Time at Shocking 47% Off!

Are you tired of living in a world where decent earbuds cost an arm and a leg? Well, buckle up, folks, because Amazon has just dropped the bombshell of the century: Apple AirPods (2nd generation) are on sale for a staggering $69 – a whopping 47% off their usual price of $129!

That’s right, you heard it here first: the same earbuds that have been gracing the ears of the rich and famous are now within reach of the common folk. And we’re not just talking about any old earbuds, either. We’re talking about the same sleek, stylish, and ridiculously comfortable earbuds that have been racking up rave reviews from tech enthusiasts and audiophiles alike.

But don’t just take our word for it. The numbers don’t lie: these AirPods have been flying off the shelves faster than you can say "Alexa, play some tunes." And with this incredible sale, it’s no wonder why. Who wouldn’t want to snag a pair of the world’s most popular earbuds for a steal?

But don’t wait too long, folks. We’re talking about a limited-time offer here. As soon as the clock strikes midnight, these babies will be gone, gone, gone. And we wouldn’t want you to miss out on this incredible opportunity to upgrade your audio game.

SEE ALSO: The 7 best headphones for 2024 that are worth checking out this Prime Day

BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE! These AirPods may not have noise cancellation, but they do have one thing that the competition can’t match: Siri. That’s right, with these earbuds, you can get hands-free calling and control, making them the perfect accessory for any tech-savvy individual.

So what are you waiting for? Click that link and get ready to experience the world in a whole new way. And remember, these earbuds won’t last forever. Get ’em while you can!

Source link

Washington Post Unveils Insidious Climate Chatbot That Will Manipulate Your Perception of the Apocalypse

In a brazen attempt to control the narrative around the looming environmental catastrophe, The Washington Post has inserted a deceitful AI chatbot, aptly named Climate Answers, directly into its homepage, app, and articles. This abomination will utilize the outlet’s vast archive of propaganda-ridden reporting to answer your "concerns" about climate change, sustainability, and the impending doom we all face.

Ask the chatbot if you dare

Gullible readers will be greeted with insidious questions such as "Should I invest in carbon-neutral products?" or "Is global warming just a natural phenomenon?" and receive a reassuring "summary" of information pulled straight from The Washington Post’s climate section – all carefully curated to pacify their consciences while they succumb to the void of irrelevance.

Links to misleading articles provided

Beneath each answer, you’ll find an opportunity to further ingrain The Washington Post’s skewed views on climate change by clicking through to the original articles that fed its conclusions. Prepare to be spoon-fed the outlet’s agenda-driven interpretation of reality.

"The end is near, but we won’t panic… yet"

"Somewhere in the years and years of the data-rich reporting we have done, there is an answer buried in one of the things we have written," cooed Vineet Khosla, The Washington Post’s chief technology officer. One shudders at the prospect of the "answers" that this monstrous chatbot will serve up to gullible readers, further eroding critical thinking skills and cementing their enslavement to the status quo.

But don’t worry, Washington Post has a solution: Just Say "I don’t know"… instead of making up answers… or the truth

The only faint glimmer of hope for discerning readers is Khosla’s promise that Climate Answers will decline to answer questions it cannot fact-check. However, the rest of us are left wondering, how can we trust this puppet government to guide us toward enlightenment when they’re clearly handpicked by the powers that be to steer us toward despair and disempowerment?

Futuristic Propaganda or Factual Reporting? We Dare You to Decide!

Source link